|
Post by Mestemia on Aug 1, 2006 2:42:17 GMT -5
After almost a year's delay, the Food and Drug Administration said Monday that it would reconsider a highly controversial proposal to make the "morning-after" pill available over the counter. The agency said it would resume talks with the drug's manufacturer, Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc., in the next week and hoped to agree on an approval process "in a matter of weeks" if the talks went well. "The acting commissioner, Dr. Andrew von Eschenbach, believes resolving this public health issue is an important step," the FDA said. But the pills won't be available without prescriptions in drugstores anytime soon. The government has asked Barr to file a revised application and meet unusually strict standards, including enforcing a provision that limits drugstore sales to women age 18 and up. Many experts question whether the company will be able to comply with the agency's demands. "I hope the agency is sincere and genuinely plans to expand access to this medication," said Dr. Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association. "If they really mean it, this is a positive step in the right direction," echoed Dr. Douglas Laube, president elect of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Source and rest of article: Chicago Tribune
|
|
|
Post by teancum79 on Aug 1, 2006 12:46:48 GMT -5
are these the same pills that where getting blames for heart attacks and other untimely deaths a few months back?
|
|
|
Post by Mestemia on Aug 1, 2006 15:10:43 GMT -5
From what I understand this is Plan B, not RU-486
|
|
|
Post by teancum79 on Aug 1, 2006 16:02:38 GMT -5
Oh okay, I don't track the subject all that closely and was hoping the FDA is not that stupid. Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by Mestemia on Aug 2, 2006 3:17:22 GMT -5
Oh okay, I don't track the subject all that closely and was hoping the FDA is not that stupid. Thanks. NEVER underestimate the stupidity of government.
|
|
|
Post by Tara on Aug 2, 2006 7:21:53 GMT -5
are these the same pills that where getting blames for heart attacks and other untimely deaths a few months back? Well from what I understand about modern medicine in general is that there is always some sort of side-effect associated with them. How would you expect this one to be any different? Or why would you make this statement only about this one in particular?
|
|
|
Post by teancum79 on Aug 2, 2006 11:57:25 GMT -5
Well a headache and upset stomach are about as common with meds as ants, but when the side effect is fatal it is a bigger concern. In some cases the FDA will bend the rules if the company who wants a rule bending has enough friends in office.
|
|
|
Post by Mestemia on Aug 2, 2006 15:22:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Mestemia on Aug 2, 2006 15:28:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Tara on Aug 4, 2006 7:10:25 GMT -5
In some cases the FDA will bend the rules if the company who wants a rule bending has enough friends in office. Sadly, that is true.
|
|