|
Post by littlepea on Mar 1, 2006 23:36:39 GMT -5
His statistis state that people are more likely to be homosexual if they are abused and that a significant minority have been, not that a majority of them have been. If this is what your claiming i think you'll need more statistics to back that one up. This is not a disease that needs to be cured, its a class of people that needs understanding from the rest of us yeah, sorry, i misread his statistic. i thought they were saying that 46% of men who were abused as children turned out gay and 7% turned out straight, but that wouldn't make sense ... but still, if it were entirely genetic then surely the numbers would be the same regardless of sexuality? presumably that difference is too great to be attributed to an abnormal set of test subjects?
|
|
|
Post by Tara on Mar 12, 2006 22:32:15 GMT -5
Hermaphrodite... or something like that. Yeah, hermaphrodite or whatever they are considered to be... how would one explain what their orientation is supposed to be? How do you explain something like like spiritually? For example, people would say that it is God's choice to say that man must love only women and vice versa. What about these people who are born with both genitals?
|
|
|
Post by dianaholberg on Mar 13, 2006 10:07:02 GMT -5
Actually, Catholic belief is that all are called to be chaste.
|
|